Date (Publication)

2017-09-18

Date (Creation)

2015-05-08

Citation identifier

https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533

Citation identifier

doi: / 10.5285/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533

Other citation details

Deere, N.J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Baking, E.L., Bernard, H., Pfeifer, M., Reynolds, G., Wearn, O.R., Davies, Z.G., Struebig, M.J. (2017). Mammal detection data for the SAFE project site, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 2015 [HMTF]. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre 10.5285/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533

Point of contact

Organisation name	Individual name	Electronic mail address	Role
University of Kent	Deere, N.	njd21@kent.ac.uk	Point of contact
University of Kent	Deere, N.J.	njd21@kent.ac.uk	Author
University of Melbourne	Guillera-Arroita, G.	gurutzeta.guillera@unimelb.edu.au	Author
Universiti Malaysia Sabah	Baking, E.L.	lonnbw@gmail.com	Author
Universiti Malaysia Sabah	Bernard, H.	hbtiandun@gmail.com	Author
Newcastle University	Pfeifer, M.	Marion.Pfeifer@newcastle.ac.uk	Author
South East Asia Rainforest Research Partnership (SEARRP)	Reynolds, G.	n.searrp@icloud.com	Author
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London	Wearn, O.R.	oliver.wearn@gmail.com	Author
University of Kent	Davies, Z.G.	z.g.davies@kent.ac.uk	Author
University of Kent	Struebig, M.J.	m.j.struebig@kent.ac.uk	Author
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre		info@eidc.ac.uk	Custodian
NERC Environmental Information Data Centre		info@eidc.ac.uk	Publisher
University of Kent		EMAIL NOT PROVIDED	Owner

Maintenance and update frequency

Not planned

GEMET - Concepts, version 4.1.3

• tropical forest
• mammal

GeoNames

• Malaysia
• Borneo
• Sabah

Keywords

• Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems (SAFE)

• Human-modified tropical forest (HMTF)

• fragmentation

• occupancy

• human-modified landscape

• oil palm

Access constraints

Other restrictions

Other constraints

no limitations

Use constraints

Other restrictions

Other constraints

This resource is made available under the terms of the Open Government Licence

Use constraints

Other restrictions

Other constraints

© University of Kent 2017

Use constraints

Other restrictions

Other constraints

If you reuse this data, you should cite: Deere, N.J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Baking, E.L., Bernard, H., Pfeifer, M., Reynolds, G., Wearn, O.R., Davies, Z.G., Struebig, M.J. (2017). Mammal detection data for the SAFE project site, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, 2015 [HMTF]. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533

Spatial representation type

Text, table

Language

English

Character set

UTF8

Topic category

• Biota

Begin date

2015-05-20

End date

2015-10-08

Unique resource identifier

WGS 84

Distribution format

Name	Version
Comma-separated values (CSV)

Distributor contact

Organisation name	Individual name	Electronic mail address	Role
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre		info@eidc.ac.uk	Distributor

OnLine resource

Protocol	Linkage	Name
	https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/data/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533	Download the data

OnLine resource

Protocol	Linkage	Name
	https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/sd/62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533.zip	Supporting information

OnLine resource

Protocol	Linkage	Name
	https://eidc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/browsegraphics/safe.png	SAFE

Hierarchy level

Dataset

Other

dataset

Statement

Remotely-operated digital cameras (HC500 Hyperfire, Reconyx, Wisconsin, U.S.A.) were deployed at 130 locations across the 203 landscape between May and September 2015. These locations were separated by a mean distance of 1.4 km and distributed across an elevational gradient (mean=376 m.a.s.l.; range=64-735 m.a.s.l.). Accounting for theft, vandalism and malfunction, data were retrieved from 120 locations. Sampling was stratified within four broad habitat classes to capture the heterogeneity of the landscape: continuous logged forest, highly disturbed forest, isolated forest remnants and oil palm plantations. Due to the number of cameras available, data collection was completed over two rotations, each comprising 65 locations. Single units were deployed for 42 consecutive nights per location, yielding a total survey effort of 4,669 camera nights. Cameras were positioned at a standardised height of 30cm, on low resistance travel routes (e.g. riparian areas, logging roads, skid trails) and off-trail to account for inter- and intra-specific differences in habitat use. Prior to analyses, all images that could not be identified to species level were discarded (blurred images and photos of non-target species, equating to 17.6% of data). A detection matrix was developed for each species, whereby 42-day sampling periods were divided into six, seven-day temporal replicates. Any camera site active for fewer than seven days was excluded from analysis, leaving 115 analytical units each with 2-6 replicates. The detection matrices denote species presence ('1'), absence ('0') or camera trap malfunction ('NA') during each sampling interval. During deployment, GPS coordinates of the specific site were documented. During the processing of camera trap data we further documented the exact date and time for deployment, collection or failure in the event of malfunction. These data were used to provide an indication of sampling effort.

Metadata

File identifier

62774180-ae72-4873-9482-e8be3935f533 XML

Metadata language

English

Character set

8859 Part 1

Hierarchy level

Dataset

Hierarchy level name

dataset

Date stamp

2026-03-02T09:49:40

Metadata standard name

UK GEMINI

Metadata standard version

2.3

Metadata author

Organisation name	Individual name	Electronic mail address	Role
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre		info@eidc.ac.uk	Point of contact