• BGS Hosted Metadata
  •   Search
  •   Map
  •  Sign in

Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies, 2016

The Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies, 2016, rates 104 jurisdictions around the world based on a combination of their geologic attractiveness for minerals and metals and their policy attractiveness. The survey is an attempt to assess how mineral endowments and public policy factors such as taxation and regulatory uncertainty affect exploration investment. The survey was circulated electronically to approximately 2,700 individuals between August 30th and November 18th, 2016. Survey responses have been tallied to rank provinces, states, and countries according to the extent that public policy factors encourage or discourage mining investment.

A total of 350 responses were received for the survey, providing sufficient data to evaluate 104 jurisdictions. By way of comparison, 109 jurisdictions were evaluated in 2015, 122 in 2014, 112 in 2013, and 96 in 2012. The number of jurisdictions that can be included in the study tends to wax and wane as the mining sector grows or shrinks due to commodity prices and sectoral factors.

An overall Investment Attractiveness Index is constructed by combining the Best Practices Mineral Potential index, which rates regions based on their geologic attractiveness, and the Policy Perception Index, a composite index that measures the effects of government policy on attitudes toward exploration investment. While it is useful to measure the attractiveness of a jurisdiction based on policy factors such as onerous regulations, taxation levels, the quality of infrastructure, and the other policy related questions respondents answered, the Policy Perception Index alone does not recognize the fact that investment decisions are often sizably based on the pure mineral potential of a jurisdiction. Indeed, as discussed below, respondents consistently indicate that only about 40 percent of their investment decision is determined by policy factors.



Website:

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/annual-survey-of-mining-companies-2016

Simple

Date (Creation)
2017-02-28
Date (Publication)
2017-02-28
Date (Revision)
Edition

2016

Citation identifier
https://www.mica-project.eu/ / MICA_B3-79

MICA WP3 2018-11-03T15:16:00 Record extracted from Batch 3 spreadsheet

Other citation details

No other citation details provided

Purpose

Purpose for data generation is not known

Status
On going
Point of contact
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role

Fraser Institute

Resource provider
Maintenance and update frequency
Annually
dataCentre
  • MICA

MICA ontology (TemporalScheme)

  • Recent (includes data from 2006 onwards)

MICA ontology (DataScheme)

  • General descriptive information / Website / Lobbying group (Website)

Keywords
  • Requirement for data generation: Voluntary

Keywords
  • Method of data or information generation: Systematic sampling (i.e. a sample of respondents, chosen systematically)

GEMET Concepts

  • Geochemical

GEMET Concepts

  • Mineralogical

GEMET Concepts

  • Sciences dealing with the composition, structure, origin of the Earth's rocks

GEMET Concepts

  • Society

GEMET Concepts

  • Stocks

Keywords
  • Structure

INSPIRE commodities

  • Gold

INSPIRE commodities

  • Silver

INSPIRE commodities

  • Platinum

INSPIRE commodities

  • Palladium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Other platinum group metals (iridium)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Other platinum group metals (osmium)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Other platinum group metals (rhodium)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Other platinum group metals (ruthenium)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Aluminium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Copper

INSPIRE commodities

  • Lead

INSPIRE commodities

  • Tin

INSPIRE commodities

  • Zinc

INSPIRE commodities

  • Chromium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Cobalt

INSPIRE commodities

  • Iron

INSPIRE commodities

  • Manganese

INSPIRE commodities

  • Molybdenum

INSPIRE commodities

  • Nickel

INSPIRE commodities

  • Niobium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Tungsten

INSPIRE commodities

  • Vanadium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Antimony

INSPIRE commodities

  • Beryllium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Bismuth

INSPIRE commodities

  • Cadmium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Cesium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Gallium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Germanium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Hafnium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Indium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Lithium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Magnesium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Mercury

INSPIRE commodities

  • Rare earths (undifferentiated)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Rhenium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Rubidium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Selenium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Tantalum

INSPIRE commodities

  • Tellurium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Titanium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Zirconium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Anthracite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Bituminous coal

INSPIRE Fossil Fuel

  • Other hard coal

INSPIRE commodities

  • Lignite

INSPIRE Fossil Fuel

  • Crude oil

INSPIRE Fossil Fuel

  • Oil shale

INSPIRE Fossil Fuel

  • Natural gas

INSPIRE Geothermal Potential

  • Geothermal energy

INSPIRE Fossil Fuel

  • Peat

INSPIRE commodities

  • Thorium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Uranium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Diamonds

INSPIRE commodities

  • Emerald

INSPIRE commodities

  • Ruby, saphire, corundum (gemstone)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Other gemstones (e.g. beryl, quartz, tourmalines, garnets, topaz, peridot, zircon, etc)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Arsenic

INSPIRE commodities

  • Asbestos

INSPIRE commodities

  • Barytes (barite)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Borates

INSPIRE commodities

  • Bromine

INSPIRE commodities

  • Diatomite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Feldspar

INSPIRE commodities

  • Fluorspar (fluorite)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Graphite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Gypsum

INSPIRE commodities

  • Iodine

INSPIRE commodities

  • Magnesite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Mica

INSPIRE commodities

  • Natural sodium carbonate (including trona)

INSPIRE commodities

  • Nepheline syenite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Perlite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Salt

INSPIRE commodities

  • Sillimanite

INSPIRE commodities

  • kyanite

INSPIRE commodities

  • andalusite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Strontium

INSPIRE commodities

  • Talc

INSPIRE commodities

  • Pyrophyllite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Vermiculite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Wollastonite

INSPIRE Enduse Potential

  • Abrasives

INSPIRE commodities

  • Sodium sulphate

INSPIRE commodities

  • Quartz, quartzite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Silica sand

INSPIRE commodities

  • Zeolite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Sulphur

INSPIRE commodities

  • Pyrite

INSPIRE commodities

  • Phosphate rock

INSPIRE commodities

  • Potash

INSPIRE commodities

  • Bentonite

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Risks

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Supply

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Environmental legislation

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Environment health and safety policy

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • National emission legislation

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Regional/provincial environmental laws

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Mineral policy/strategy

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Product declaration

MICA ontology (DomainScheme)

  • Standardization

Access constraints
Other restrictions
Use constraints
Other restrictions
Language
English
Topic category
  • Geoscientific information
  • Economy
Geographic identifier
World; with individual countries listed
Hierarchy level
Non geographic dataset
Other

Individual item (e.g. a one-off academic paper or single website)

Conformance result

Title

Data uncertainty

Date
Explanation

Are any uncertainty measures provided (e.g. standard errors, confidence intervals, etc.)?

Pass
No

Conformance result

Title

Quality assurance procedures

Date
Explanation

Are quality assurance procedures described?

Pass
Yes

Conformance result

Title

Information generation methods

Date
Explanation

Are data or information generation methods formally described?

Pass
Yes

Conformance result

Title

Record review

Date
Other citation details

Reviewed by: British Geological Survey

Explanation

Record validation

Pass
No

Conformance result

Title
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services
Date (Publication)
2010-12-08
Statement

Organisation source implies that information should be of good quality

Metadata

File identifier
641db28a-1ea7-4e50-8100-97a587ec0a71 XML
Metadata language
English
Character set
MD_CharacterSetCode_utf8
Hierarchy level
Non geographic dataset
Date stamp
2024-11-07
Metadata standard name

ISO19115

Metadata standard version

2003/Cor.1:2006

Metadata author
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role

British Geological Survey

enquiries@bgs.ac.uk

Point of contact
 
 

Overviews

overview

Keywords

MICA


Provided by

logo

Share on social sites

Access to the catalogue
Read here the full details and access to the data.




  •   About
  •   Github
  •