• BGS Hosted Metadata
  •   Search
  •   Map
  •  Sign in

Pollination of tomatoes by the bees Bombus terrestris and Lasioglossum spp.

This dataset describes an experimental test of potential over yielding effects on fruit set and average fruit size for tomato plants grown in the presence of three pollinator combinations: (1) the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (2) Lasioglossum spp. and (3) and additive combination of B. terrestris and Lasioglossum spp. The experimental design includes no pollinator controls nested within individual tomato plants exposed to the above pollinator species treatment combinations. This research was undertaken in 2017 and funded though a UKCEH Commercial Innovation Fund (National Capability) project supported by the Natural Environmental Research Council (Project NEC06344). Full details about this dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5285/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5

Simple

Date (Publication)
2018-08-30
Citation identifier
https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5
Citation identifier
doi: / 10.5285/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5
Other citation details

Woodcock, B.A., Pywell, R.F. (2018). Pollination of tomatoes by the bees Bombus terrestris and Lasioglossum spp.. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre 10.5285/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5

Point of contact
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

Woodcock, B.

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

Point of contact
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Woodcock, B.A.

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

Author
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Pywell, R.F.

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

Author
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre

info@eidc.ac.uk

Custodian
NERC Environmental Information Data Centre

info@eidc.ac.uk

Publisher
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

enquiries@ceh.ac.uk

Owner

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0

  • Environmental Monitoring Facilities

Access constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints
no limitations
Use constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints
This resource is made available under the terms of the Open Government Licence
Use constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints

© UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

Use constraints
Other restrictions
Other constraints

If you reuse this data, you should cite: Woodcock, B.A., Pywell, R.F. (2018). Pollination of tomatoes by the bees Bombus terrestris and Lasioglossum spp.. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5

Spatial representation type
Text, table
Distance
10  urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001
Language
English
Character set
UTF8
Topic category
  • Environment
  • Biota
  • Farming
Begin date
2017-04-01
End date
2017-06-30
N
S
E
W
thumbnail




Unique resource identifier
WGS 84
Distribution format
Name Version

Comma-separated values (CSV)

Distributor contact
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role

NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre

info@eidc.ac.uk

Distributor
OnLine resource
Protocol Linkage Name
https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/sd/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5.zip

Supporting information

OnLine resource
Protocol Linkage Name
https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/data/94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5

Download the data

Hierarchy level
Dataset
Other

dataset

Conformance result

Title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services

Date (Publication)
2010-12-08
Statement

Three treatment combinations of bee pollinators foraging on tomatoes were compared: 1) B. terrestris alone (a single 30-40 worker colony); 2) Lasioglossum spp. alone, predominantly malachurum but with some pauxillum); 3) a combination of B. terrestris (a single 30-40 worker colony) and Lasioglossum spp.. All experiments were undertaken under field conditions within three, 2 x 3 m net cages designed to hold free flying bees. B. terrestris colonies were obtained as commercially available stock (Biobest Ltd) but there is no equivalent for Lasioglossum spp.. To address this resident populations of L. malachurum and L. pauxillum were identified. These were found on bare and compacted soil oil of arable field corners. Over populations of Lasioglossum spp. two net cages were established, with a third in close proximity although not covering populations of the Lasioglossum spp.. Into this latter cage a B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was established. A further B. terrestris colony (30-40 workers) was allowed to forage in one of the cages covering Lasioglossum nests (Treatment 3), while the other was left without such a colony (Treatment 2). Population density of Lasioglossum in both cages was broadly equivalent, with c. 4.2 (± 0.8) nest borrows m-2. Treatment combinations were additive in terms of bee density reflecting likely practice under greenhouse growing conditions. Nets were only positioned over supporting cages on days when the experiment was being undertaken, to prevent starving of wild Lasioglossum populations. As tomato plants produce no nectar it was necessary to cage a small quantity of Asteraceae garden plants to provide a nectar source for the bees. Experimental tomato plants (var. 'Moneymaker') were established under controlled greenhouse conditions where pollinators were excluded and were translocated to the experimental site when they had multiple flowering stems. Assessments were restricted to the first five mature flowers on each stem; subsequent flowers were removed. On each plant two flowering stems were selected, one was left open to pollination in the cages with treatments 1-3, the other was treated as a control and covered in a small net bag to prevent access by pollinators. Batches of five plants were placed in each of the three cages for a four-day period, with this repeated four times. After each period of exposure all plants were returned to greenhouse conditions and left to mature. When tomatoes had reached the same point of maturation (deep red colour) the number of fruits produced was counted (out of a maximum of five per stem) and the individual mass of each fruit was determined.

Metadata

File identifier
94925db4-eeeb-4f3d-ae19-42a3380636e5 XML
Metadata language
English
Character set
8859 Part 1
Hierarchy level
Dataset
Hierarchy level name

dataset

Date stamp
2025-03-21T13:20:23
Metadata standard name
UK GEMINI
Metadata standard version

2.3

Metadata author
Organisation name Individual name Electronic mail address Role
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre

info@eidc.ac.uk

Point of contact
 
 

Overviews

Spatial extent

thumbnail

Keywords

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0

Environmental Monitoring Facilities


Provided by

logo

Share on social sites

Access to the catalogue
Read here the full details and access to the data.




  •   About
  •   Github
  •